HAS THE POST-1994 SOUTH AFRICAN DEMOCRATIC STATE LOST LEGITIMACY: ASSESSING THE STATE'S LEGITIMACY 31 YEARS SINCE THE DEMOCRATIC BREAKTHROUGH.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/ssh.v11i1.2475Keywords:
Democratic legitimacy, South Africa, inequality, corruption, party dominance, governanceAbstract
This study critically examines whether the post-1994 South African democratic state has retained legitimacy 31 years after the democratic breakthrough. Employing a mixed-methods approach that combined six in-depth qualitative interviews with 24 quantitative survey responses, the research assessed citizens’ perceptions of democratic performance across four key dimensions: the fulfilment of democratic promises, the impact of inequality and unemployment, the role of corruption and dominant-party politics, and South Africa’s positioning within global indices of democracy. Findings reveal that while formal political rights such as universal suffrage and media freedom remain intact, substantive legitimacy is eroded by persistent socio-economic exclusion, high unemployment, and deep inequality. Quantitative data indicated that 72 percent of respondents considered inequality the greatest threat to democracy, while qualitative narratives underscored widespread disillusionment with service delivery and exclusion from economic opportunities. Corruption emerged as the most significant factor undermining trust, with 80 percent of respondents linking it to declining legitimacy. Moreover, the African National Congress’s continued dominance was seen as weakening accountability, echoing comparative studies of single-party systems. Global assessments, including those of Freedom House and the Economist Intelligence Unit, were broadly perceived as accurate reflections of domestic realities. The study concludes that South Africa remains a “flawed democracy,” resilient in its institutional structures yet fragile in citizen trust. Recommendations emphasise inclusive economic reforms, stronger anti-corruption mechanisms, enhanced electoral competitiveness, and constructive engagement with international assessments as essential to restoring legitimacy and sustaining democratic consolidation.
Downloads
References
Afrobarometer. (2021). South Africans see corruption as worsening under Ramaphosa. The Institute for Justice and Reconciliation. Available at: https://www.afrobarometer.org/wp-
Economist Intelligence Unit. (2023). Democracy Index 2022: World democracy in crisis. Economist Intelligence Unit. Retrieved from https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2022
Elkins, D.J. and Simeon, R.E.B. (1979). A cause in search of its effect, or what does political culture explain? Comparative Politics, 11(2), pp.127–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/421752
Fragile States Index. (2023). Annual report 2023. Fund for Peace. Retrieved from https://fragilestatesindex.org/2023/06/14/fragile-states-index-2023-annual-report/
Freedom House. (2024). Freedom in the World: South Africa 2024. Freedom House.
Govindasamy, P. and Patel, J. (2021). South Africans see corruption as worsening during Ramaphosa era. Afrobarometer Dispatch No. 476.
Gqubule, D. (2023). Migrant flows to SA and unbalanced economic development. Business Live.
Greene, K. F. (2010). The political economy of authoritarian single-party dominance. Comparative Political Studies, 43(7), 807–834.
Herre, B. (2023). The ‘Varieties of Democracy’ data: How do researchers measure democracy? Our World in Data. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/vdem-electoral-democracy-data
IMF. (2020). Six charts explain South Africa’s inequality. International Monetary Fund.
Isike, C. (2021). Book predicts the ANC’s last decade of political dominance in South Africa. Mail & Guardian.
Mancebo, A. (2021). Stability and governability: The benign effects of party dominance in South Africa. Insight on Africa, 13(1), pp.56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0975087820965172
Matebese-Notshulwana, K.M. and Lebakeng, T.J. (2020). The legislature and the challenges of re-imagining South Africa. Strategic Review for Southern Africa, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.35293/srsa.v42i1.206
Mbandlwa, Z., Dorasamy, N. and Fagbadebo, O. (2020). Leadership challenges in the South African local government system. Journal of Critical Reviews.
Mlambo, D. N., & Gwala, F. N. (2021). From colonial to apartheid transition: Social and economic impact of South Africa’s marginalised population through the lens of the Covid-19 pandemic. African Renaissance, 18(3).
Mtimka, O. (2021). Anatomy of the ANC in power: Insights from Port Elizabeth. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 39(3), 410–414.
Müller, M. (2021). South Africa’s social and political challenges: Covid-19 exacerbates socioeconomic inequalities amid ANC infighting. SWP Comment, 61/2021.
Müller, M. (2021). South Africa’s social and political challenges: Covid-19 exacerbates socioeconomic inequalities amid ANC infighting (No. 61/2021). SWP Comment. Retrieved from https://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2021C61_SouthAfrica.pdf
Municipal IQ. (2023). Press release. Available at: https://www.municipaliq.co.za/index.php?site_page=press.php
Ölmunger, P. (2023). EIU 2022 Democracy Report: Stagnation, war and no post-COVID revival. Democracy Without Borders. Retrieved from https://www.democracywithoutborders.org/26249/economist-2022-democracy-report-stagnation-war-and-no-post-covid-revival
Petersen, S. (2020). Does a dominant party democracy erode constitutional legitimacy? Master’s dissertation, University of Cape Town.
Rondganger, L. (2023). 10 startling facts about why South Africa is the most unequal country in the world and who the other nine are. IOL News.
Schoeberlein, J. (2020). National strategies for advancing good governance in Africa. Transparency International. Retrieved from https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/helpdesk/national-strategies-for-advancing-good-governance-in-africa
Statistics South Africa. (2023). Quarterly Labour Force Survey: Quarter 2. Statistics SA.
The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). (2022). Democracy Index 2022: World democracy in crisis. Economist Intelligence Unit. Retrieved from https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2022
Valodia, I. (2023). South Africa can’t crack the inequality curse: Why, and what can be done? The Conversation.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal For Research In Social Science And Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
In consideration of the journal, Green Publication taking action in reviewing and editing our manuscript, the authors undersigned hereby transfer, assign, or otherwise convey all copyright ownership to the Editorial Office of the Green Publication in the event that such work is published in the journal. Such conveyance covers any product that may derive from the published journal, whether print or electronic. Green Publication shall have the right to register copyright to the Article in its name as claimant, whether separately
or as part of the journal issue or other medium in which the Article is included.
By signing this Agreement, the author(s), and in the case of a Work Made For Hire, the employer, jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere, and is not being considered for publication elsewhere in any form, except as provided herein. Each author’s signature should appear below. The signing author(s) (and, in



